Mine litterære krumspring

There are somewhat hidden messages in every media news articles which include political statements. I'm not paranoid or wishing for a scoop, I'll guess everyone knows a little about it watching films about the subject. A film that describes this phenomenon goes deep, but not deep enough to bring the exact momentum into place. They simply can't do it because of hidden and unwritten laws about unveiling too much to the public domain. It's not that it's forbidden, but it will cause too many players in the field at the same time, confusing more than explaining things.

We know what media can produce of one small scale case, turning it into a national or international landslide that kills the original message and even sometimes people connected to it. The burden of being the revelator contributing to death, havoc or serious feuds, will in most cases today be divided into several cases or incidents carving out a path visible only for a few. So the thin red line exists, but only those with the right keys can intercept and read their "Enigma-tic" messages.

I have no plausible proof about this, but it would be unachievable to manage or be a part of, a messaging system you're not a member of yourself. And the fractural nature of it, are so advanced and alienated to the public eye, that you can read, watch and perceive without even being close to the message itself. And the first question is why they do this and on what basis they need a message system like this, when there are so many other means to communicate.

In these times, a hidden signal can be intercepted and decoded by a large number of people. But an "Enigma-tic" system in the media would be missed by the same crowd because it's too damn many articles to search, watch and get the right significant pieces together. To search and combine 10 articles about the same thing into the real message, the computers today would too long time to make it considered as a valued piece of information. And that's why only few people write about it, because they will be the laughing stock and soon be written off as lunatics bending the edge.

And that means the listening-in targeted audience killing off the busted channel, so it remains solid. And when I find my first, I will post it here.